Debating the ‘skills revolution’

Want to read spiked ad-free? Become a spiked supporter.
The UK Department for Education (DfE) is in the midst of a philosophical battle over the nature of education – or what Schools Week editor Laura McInerney has described as a ‘masturbatory inter-ministerial argument’.
Nick Gibb, the education and equalities minister, has banned civil servants from using the term ‘skills’ when referring to education, because, as McInerney claims, ‘he doesn’t believe they exist’. Meanwhile, the new education secretary, Damian Hinds, is arguing for the importance of ‘soft skills’ (a focus on developing pupils’ character and resilience). To complicate things further, many Tories, including the former secretary of state for education, Justine Greening, are promoting the idea of a ‘skills revolution’.
Gibb has tried to argue his way out of this confusion by using semantics. He told the Education World Forum that when the Tories speak of ‘skills’, they really mean ‘knowledge-based skills’. But, as confusing and trivial as all this sounds, McInerney is wrong – this isn’t about intellectual masturbation.
The knowledge-versus-skills debate is extremely important. Until Michael Gove arrived as secretary of state for education, the battle for knowledge and a subject-based education was almost lost. Education was being restructured around skills said to prepare young people for the new global economy. Thankfully, this seems to be changing – especially in some new free schools and in parts of the curriculum.
McInerney mocks Gibb, in particular, but her approach is rather philistine. She argues: ‘Schools don’t need ministers to lock horns over philosophy, they need them to stop pratting about with cheap shots and nonsense, and instead come up with actual solutions to actual problems and announce those.’ But what she and many teachers and educationalists can’t see is that philosophical debates about the nature of education are crucial to ensuring a healthy system. Without a debate about what we should be teaching kids, we can’t identify the problems – or what the solutions might be.
What is happening in the DfE should be happening in every school and university in the UK. And if we want to be rid of the endless war over skills, educators must defend the principle of a knowledge-based education.
Dennis Hayes is a professor of education at the University of Derby.
HELP US HIT OUR 1% TARGET
spiked is funded by you. It’s your generosity that keeps us going and growing.
Only 0.1% of our regular readers currently donate to spiked. If you are one of the 99.9% who appreciates what we do, but hasn’t given just yet, please consider making a donation today.
If just 1% of our loyal readers donated regularly, it would be transformative for us, allowing us to vastly expand our team and coverage.
Plus, if you donate £5 a month or £50 a year, you can join and enjoy:
–Ad-free reading
–Exclusive bonus content
–Regular events
–Access to our comments section
The most impactful way to support spiked’s journalism is by registering as a supporter and making a monthly contribution. Thank you.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Only spiked supporters and patrons, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.