Sadiq Khan’s naked hypocrisy

Why is the London mayor throwing money at some underwear ads while banning others?


Topics Culture Feminism Free Speech UK

This is a bit of random text from Kyle to test the new global option to add a message at the top of every article. This bit is linked somewhere.

London mayor Sadiq Khan has awarded £500,000 worth of free advertising on the London Underground to hosiery brand Nubian Skin.

The brand’s ‘A different kind of nude’ campaign was unveiled by the mayor as the winner of a Transport for London competition to promote diversity in advertising. The adverts, to be displayed in prominent positions across the tube network, feature men and women in nude-toned underwear.

— Mayor of London (@MayorofLondon) February 10, 2020

Most people are fine seeing men and women in underwear and are unlikely to find anything offensive about the adverts. But Sadiq Khan – notoriously – does not like to see women in underwear in adverts.

One of Khan’s first moves as mayor was to ban Protein World’s ‘beach body ready’ adverts, which featured a fitness model in a bikini.

‘As the father of two teenage girls, I’m extremely concerned about this kind of advertising, which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies’, he said at the time.

Much of the feminist backlash to the beach-body adverts (rather ludicrously) presented itself as being about ‘body shaming’, as if the mere presence of a conventionally attractive woman can demean others. Yet Khan’s TfL has also banned adverts featuring partial nudity on entirely prudish grounds.

In 2017, TfL banned an advert for Heist, a tights brand. The ad showed a model leaping into the air. She was wearing only Heist tights and was therefore – horror of horrors – exposing her naked back to unsuspecting commuters.

The advert was branded ‘overly sexualised’ and the tights company was ordered to cover up the offending back.

— Rosie Webster (@DrRosieW) October 12, 2017

Censorship is clearly the norm in Sadiq Khan’s London. (And that’s before we even get on to TfL’s ban on junk-food advertising, which was so restrictive that even TfL’s own advertising was censored.)

The grounds for censorship are totally opaque. Most tube users will struggle to divine why one underwear advert is empowering, but others need to be taken down.

Sadiq the censor needs to drop the double standards and the woke puritanism that drive his advertising policy.

Picture by: Mayor of London / Twitter.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Topics Culture Feminism Free Speech UK


Want to join the conversation?

Only spiked supporters and patrons, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.

Join today