Donate

Big Brother is watching you watching porn

Australian proposals for facial recognition on porn sites are creepy and authoritarian.

Tarric Brooker

Topics Culture Free Speech Politics World

Want to read spiked ad-free? Become a spiked supporter.

There has been much talk about the growing encroachment on civil liberties and privacy in Britain and the United States. But in recent years Australia has been putting some of its Western rivals to shame with the invasiveness of its policies.

Under a proposal recently put forward by Peter Dutton’s Department of Home Affairs, Australians would be subject to a facial-recognition scan in order to access porn sites.

This would likely entail the camera on the viewer’s phone, laptop or desktop snapping an image to be sent to government servers for verification. A potential viewer’s photo would then be cross-checked against a national database of images taken from drivers licenses and passport photos.

This proposal is supposedly aimed at addressing concerns about children accessing porn. The idea is that while other age-verification schemes – such as those recently pursued and then abandoned in Britain – could be circumvented relatively easily, this one would help ensure children are ‘safe’ online.

Nevertheless, academics have warned that the success of age-verification schemes has been limited everywhere they have been tried – with people using various online tools to get around the system.

Enjoying Spiked?

Support us with an instant, one-off donation.

Please wait...
Thank you!

More importantly, these schemes are a gross invasion of privacy. In Australia, these sinister proposals are just the latest in a long line. The porn age-verification idea was intended to be part of a broader government plan that would allow government agencies, telecoms companies and banks to use facial-recognition technology.

It was recently reported that a number of schools were trialling facial-recognition software. Part-funded by the federal government, these schemes used methods first developed in China to monitor students.

Though there has been significant public and political backlash to all this, Australia is still heading down a worrying road – one that risks undermining our reputation as a laid-back, freedom-loving place.

If Peter Dutton got his way, Big Brother wouldn’t just be watching you, he’d be watching you watching porn. That’s a terrifying prospect on every level.

Tarric Brooker is a journalist.

Picture by: Getty.

This is what we're up against...

A media ecosystem dominated by a handful of billionaire owners, bad actors spreading disinformation online and the rich and powerful trying to stop us publishing stories. But we have you on our side. Supporters help to fund our journalism and those who choose All-access digital enjoy exclusive extras:

  1. Unlimited articles in our app and ad-free reading on all devices
  2. Exclusive newsletter and far fewer asks for support
  3. Full access to the Guardian Feast app

If you can, please support us on a monthly basis and make a big impact in support of open, independent journalism. Thank you.

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Only spiked supporters and patrons, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.

Join today